To say that he was in the celebration is an understatement. In fact, the event just wouldn’t be complete without him. He gave glam a new meaning with his presence. He was a part of every photo; but when the negatives were developed, he wasn’t seen in a single one. The photographer rarely ever is.
The startling part of the post is that you cleverly crafted a story while giving away all the clues and I, as a reader, couldn't figure out at all! At the end of it, I had a smile on my face and a craving to read more 'tales of irony' from you.
ReplyDeleteGood one Aashish. You've brought out a very pertinent fact - I hadn't thought of it this way! Loved it.
ReplyDelete